GT vs KKR Weather Report: Rain to play spoilsport at Narendra Modi Stadium on Monday?

GT vs KKR Weather Report: Rain to play spoilsport at Narendra Modi Stadium on Monday?

Ahmedabad typically remains hot in the month of May. However, there are slight chances of downpour during the GT vs. KKR clash.

The pressure is on for both Gujarat Titans (GT) and Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) as they clash in Match 63 of the IPL 2024 season. The showdown is scheduled to take place at the grand Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad on Monday, May 13. Ahmedabad, known for its scorching summer heat, usually doesn’t experience rain during this time. However, there’s a slight chance of the showers playing spoilsport.

GT will be brimming with confidence after their dominating win against Chennai Super Kings. Openers Shubman Gill and Sai Sudharsan played scintillating knocks, scoring centuries to propel their team to a mammoth 231 runs. Their batting form will be a cause for concern for KKR. Kolkata, meanwhile, became the first team to qualify for the playoffs when they thrashed the Mumbai Indians (MI) in their previous game. They, however, are a win away from confirming their finish in the top two.

Top Stories

GT vs KKR weather report

The highly anticipated clash might see some rain interruptions. While Ahmedabad swelters under the usual summer heat, weather forecasts predict scattered thunderstorms with a 30% chance of rain at 7:00 PM, coinciding with the toss time for the IPL match.

According to weather.com, there are very slight chances of rain during match hours.

Time Rain chances
7 pm to 8 pm30%
8 pm to 9 pm 20%
9 pm to 10 pm 20%
10 pm to 11 pm10%

Despite the rain threat, there’s a good chance the match might proceed as scheduled. The forecast suggests scattered showers, not a continuous downpour.


Editors pick

Chennai rains likely to disrupt IPL qualifier 2 & final? Who wins in case of a washout
Share article
Follow us on social media
Google News Whatsapp channel
Tell us why didn’t you like our article so that we can improve on?