UFC: Sports have evolved into lucrative ventures, transforming athletes’ lives as they climb the ranks. Numerous individuals have risen from humble beginnings to substantial wealth, primarily attributed to their chosen sports. Icons like Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Michael Jordan, Conor McGregor, LeBron James, and more serve as prime illustrations, having amassed immense fortunes through their sporting careers. Notably, recent reports shed light on the comparatively lower revenue shares allocated to players by several tennis organizations and the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) when compared to the significantly more substantial earnings seen in the NBA, Premier League (PL), and NFL.
Tennis and UFC Lag in Athlete Revenue Share, Behind NBA and Premier League
When discussing rapidly growing sports, MMA often takes the spotlight, thanks to the UFC and its athletes who consistently raise the bar for competition, captivating audiences. Remarkably, under the guidance of Dana White and driven by its talented athletes, the UFC saw an unprecedented revenue surge, hitting an all-time high of $1.3 billion in the past year—a milestone in the organization’s financial history.
Despite the UFC’s rapid ascent akin to a rocket, the expectation of substantial earnings for its athletes isn’t entirely realized. Unlike the company’s soaring revenue, the athlete revenue share in the UFC lags behind, placing it at the bottom when compared to major sports and it’s league like Basketball League and American Football League. Interestingly, the UFC’s athlete revenue share aligns more closely with that of tennis, rather than the more lucrative compensation models seen in other prominent leagues.
According to the reports, the UFC allocates around 13-17% of its revenue to its fighters, which is notably lower compared to various tennis organizations that share 18% with their athletes. In contrast, the Premier League, a top-tier football league, leads the way by sharing a substantial 71% of its revenue with its athletes.
It does seem unfair when you consider that the UFC and tennis athletes, who work hard to attract fans and contribute to the sports’ revenue, receive a relatively smaller percentage (13-17% for UFC and 18% for tennis) compared to other sports like the NBA (50-60%) and the PL (71%). Athletes’ contributions should be more proportionally recognized in the revenue sharing to ensure a fair compensation for their efforts.
Stories On UFC You Must Read:
- UFC 293: How much money did Sean Strickland earn by beating Israel Adesanya?
- UFC 294: India’s Anshul Jubli confirms next fight in Makhachev vs Oliveira 2
With the recent merger of the UFC and WWE under the TKO Holdings group, expectations are high for a substantial revenue boost, possibly skyrocketing the company’s success. Given this collaboration between two sporting powerhouses, it’s reasonable to anticipate increased compensation for fighters since they’re the ones drawing in the crowds.
This change could prompt a fairer distribution of revenue, not only in the UFC but also in tennis organizations, where athletes deserve a more substantial share for their significant contribution to the sport’s popularity.
Editors pick
