In a must-win Manchester Test, it was supposed to be just another gritty phase of Test cricket. The ball was old, the light fading slightly, and India were well-placed with Rishabh Pant and Sai Sudharsan at the crease. But then came a moment that changed not only the mood in the Indian dressing room but perhaps the entire series. Pant, attempting an audacious reverse sweep off Chris Woakes, missed the ball and was struck flush on his toe. The pain was instant, and so was the concern.
What looked like a minor knock at first has proved to be a serious blow. Pant has suffered a toe fracture and is now ruled out of the series. With India already thin on resources, this freak injury leaves them with one less batter for the rest of the Test match. He has been retired hurt in the first innings. Now, Pant will also not be able to particiapte in the second innings too. And that’s where the real debate begins.
Vaughan’s call: “Clear injuries deserve substitutes too”
Former England captain Michael Vaughan was among the first to question the ICC’s current concussion rule. It is unfortunate that India cannot replace Pant, the batter, in this Test, and that is what Vaughan pointed out.
“Clear and obvious injuries in the first innings of Tests we should allow like for like Subs .. we have concussion subs so surely we can have subs for injuries like Rishabhs,” tweeted Vaughan.
His point is simple: why limit substitutions to head injuries when other equally serious external injuries can take a player out of the game completely? Pant’s injury was a sudden, external impact that left him physically unable to continue. Yet, under current rules, India can’t bring in a replacement. In a five-day contest, such situations tilt the game heavily in favour of the opposition.
Moreover, Pant’s injury occurred on the first day itself. It means India will be without their vice-captain for the rest of the game. It is unfair. What if another player gets hit and can’t continue to participate? As Vaughan stressed, ICC should take a look at these changes so that the game becomes more fair and we flare out unforeseen situations. This isn’t just about India losing a key player. It’s about a loophole in cricket’s playing conditions that doesn’t account for extraordinary injury cases like this one.
Editor's Pick
Cricket
Will Gambhir try Rishabh Pant or Nitish Reddy in IND vs SA 3rd ODI with series on the line?
Top Stories
