BCCI AGM: Tamil Nadu, UP among eight barred by Electoral Officer

BCCI, BCCI election,BCCI CoA,Sourav Ganguly,BCCI AGM

Eight state units out of the 38 were barred from attending the Annual General Meeting of the Board of Control for Cricket in India. The meeting is scheduled for October 23 in Mumbai.

The associations have been barred from the electoral process for non-compliance in their amended constitutions.

The picture on who will be attending the AGM became clear after BCCI electoral officer N Gopalaswami released the final electoral roll.

Manipur, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Maharashtra, Railways, Services, and Association of Indian Universities will not have any voting rights in case there is an election during the scheduled AGM.

The three government institutions were barred as they failed to form a players’ association.

Read More: BCCI’s ex-legal advisor terms HCA, TNCA, MCA ban arbitrary, wrong

Will BCCI elections take place as per scheduled?

Former India captain Sourav Ganguly is the nominated representative from the Cricket Association of Bengal, a body which he is heading. Mohammad Azharuddin, another former India captain, will be representing the Hyderabad Cricket Association.

Rajat Sharma (Delhi), Jay Shah (Saurashtra), Arun Singh Dhumal (Himachal Pradesh) and Brijesh Patel (Karnataka) are among the other nominated representatives.

Most of the barred state unites are likely to challenge the decision in court and that could put the AGM in jeopardy.

Tamil Nadu, which is under the control of former BCCI president N Srinivasan, was supposed to be represented by its secretary SS Ramasaamy while Haryana, under the rule of outgoing treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry, was set to be represented by Mrinal Ojha.

The TNCA, which recently elected Srinivasan’s daughter Rupa Gurunath, had 21 violations in their amended Constitution, including non-compliance in age cap (over 70 years), tenure of cooling-off period being a few major ones.

Even after they complied with a few, later on, they didn’t adhere to the major reforms and had taken a tough stand that it is not in CoA’s authority to debar any state unit as their job is to merely file status report on compliance. Haryana and Maharashtra also toed the same line.

Also Read: ICA elections: Shantha Rangaswamy set to be part of BCCI apex council

BCCI AGM: CoA may refer DDCA matter to Amicus Curiae